NRA-ILA: Supreme Court Stun Gun Ruling a Damp Squib
NRA-ILA Press release [via Ammoland.com]
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court caught both friends and foes of the Second Amendment off guard with a summary opinion in the case of Caetano v. Massachusetts, ordering the state’s highest court to reconsider its decision that stun guns are not protected under the Second Amendment. While a clear rebuke to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for its superficial treatment of the case, it is not, as at least one gun control advocate opined, a “signal” by the Supreme Court’s liberal justices “that they are not eager to overturn Heller” . . .
Significantly, Caetano was released on the same day the Supreme Court issued another order refusing to hear an appeal in the case of Bonidy v. USPS, which challenged a broad ban on the possession of firearms on postal property, even by customers in their own cars on public parking lots. We detailed that case in an earlier article, which explained that after enforcement of the regulation was limited by the trial court, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the regulation in its entirety …Read the Rest
Source:: Truth About Guns
Other News
- Biden Paid Them, Now HE Owns What they Do
- The Problem Is Academia
- Very Fine People…
- Mike Johnson Fires Back At Rowdy Pro-Palestinian Protesters During University Speech
- Congress Burns Billions On A War It Can’t Control
- Biden Bans Gas Stoves And Appliances In Federal Buildings
- Biden’s Climate Agenda Sets Sights On Crucial Sector Of The American Economy
- The Climate-Alarmist Movement Has A Big PR Problem On Its Hands
- The Elite’s Smug Sophistry Defending NPR’s Anti-Trump Bias
- A Campaign Held Hostage
Leave a Reply