Posted June 30, 2015 11:00 am by Comments

By Robert Farago

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 24:  U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) speaks next to a display of assault weapons during a news conference January 24, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced that she will introduce a bill to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds to help to stop gun violence.  (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

“I remember the hours and days after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting,” Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy opines at newstimes.com (excerpted from recent Senate testimony). “I remember feeling like I needed to be restrained about talking about the obvious policy issues that tumbled out of the facts surrounding that tragedy.” Huh? You’d kinda expect a rabid anti-gunner like Senator Murphy to stick the playbook. Wave the bloody shirt. Talk about your feelings. Call for gun control. In this op ed, Murphy skips the whole touchy feely thing. Right there we get insight into the man’s mentality . . .

It seems to me that Murphy is disassociated from his own emotions. This is a bit of surprise, given his liberal credentials. Modern liberals/progressive usually wear their hearts on their sleeves, appealing to their constituents’ hearts rather than their heads. You know; the right to “feel” safe should balance the natural, civil and Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. Like that.

But I held back because it felt like the mourning and the grieving should take precedence over action. It took me only up to the first wake that I attended to realize I was wrong.

A wake-up call …read more

Source:: Truth About Guns

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.