Posted May 18, 2015 11:40 pm by Comments

By Dean Weingarten

Alan Gura
Alan Gura

By Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten

Arizona – -(Ammoland.com)- In two opinions issued today, 18 May, 2015, Judge Scullin essentially ended the Palmer v. D.C. case by refusing to issue a contempt citation against the D.C. government. But, in another ruling on the new D.C. law, Judge Scullin issued a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of particular sections of the D.C. permit to carry law. Those sections of the law are the ones that allow the police chief to turn down permits if they do not have “good reason” for them. Here are the last paragraphs of the opinion:

ORDERS that Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the injunction are enjoined from enforcing the requirement of D.C. Code § 22-4506(a) that handgun carry license applicants have a “good reason to fear injury to his or her person or property or has any other proper reason for carrying a pistol,” including, but not limited to, the manner in which that requirement is defined by D.C. Code § 7-2509.11 and 24 D.C.M.R. §§ 2333.1, 2333.2, 2333.3, 2333.4, and 2334.1, against Plaintiffs …read more

Source:: AmmoLand

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.