Writer Thinks Our Rights Aren’t Good Reasons To Oppose Gun Laws
By Tom Knighton
Do you want to know what’s really fun? It’s an absolute blast when someone tells you what you should and shouldn’t do when those things basically allow them to get their way. Besides self-serving, it’s stupid. It’s transparent, but not in a good way. Anyone with half a brain can see through the male bovine excrement and see what that person is trying to do.
Which, of course, didn’t stop a writer from saying we shouldn’t argue against gun control.
It’s just a fact of life that handguns are now permanent legal fixtures in the American landscape. We have to live with that.
But the freedom to own a firearm doesn’t mean it has to be free of charge. It doesn’t mean that owners can’t be a tiny bit inconvenienced. And someone’s right to own a gun certainly does not trump the safety rights of the rest of us.
This is what the pro-gun people don’t seem to understand.
They’re right. It doesn’t have to be free of charge. That’s why we buy our guns.
But beyond that, they’re wrong. In every way, they’re wrong. That’s because a right delayed is a right denied, so being “inconvenienced” means our rights are infringed upon.
Source:: Bearing Arms
Leave a Reply