Posted October 28, 2019 6:00 pm by Comments

By Dave Workman

Like it or not, gun-toting hunters provide millions of dollars for wildlife conservation programs that would disappear if guns were banned. (Dave Workman photo)
Like it or not, gun-toting hunters provide millions of dollars for wildlife conservation programs that would disappear if guns were banned. (Dave Workman photo)

U.S.A.-(Ammoland.com)- Writing Monday in The Federalist, Nephi Cole—director of government relations and state affairs for the National Shooting Sports Foundation—exposed an untidy fact for gun control zealots, especially those running for the Democratic presidential nomination: Without hunters and shooters, the nation’s wildlife conservation programs could collapse.

“Almost $1 billion each year goes to state wildlife and natural resource agencies courtesy of checks written by firearms, ammunition, and related manufacturers,” Cole wrote. “It is the result of an 11 percent excise tax on firearms, ammunition, and related goods known as Pittman-Robertson, or the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937.”

According to a history of the P-R fund produced by the Congressional Research Service, “Since its creation, Pittman-Robertson has provided over $18.8 billion (in 2018 dollars; $12.2 billion in nominal dollars) to states and territories.”

As Cole observed, “The fact is, law abiding gun owners and their so-called ‘assault weapons’ contribute more money annually to conservation than the Sierra Club, Humane Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund, and the National …Read the Rest

Source:: AmmoLand

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.