Kamala Harris’s Conveniently Selective Arguments in Peruta

By Dan Zimmerman

Reader Mark N. writes:

California Attorney General Kamala Harris has moved for an en banc reconsideration/rehearing of the denial of her motion to intervene in the Peruta case (the petition may be found here). The guts of it run about seven pages. Of course she harps on the dissenting opinions in both the main case and in the denial of the motion to intervene, which is in many ways pretty insulting to the majority (and hence not very persuasive). The worst deficiency . . .

is that the brief refers to the pending en banc application in the companion …read more

Via:: Truth About Guns