Posted November 19, 2014 4:00 pm by Comments

By Dean Weingarten

546533bd56b98.image

Many posters on the Internets spout the truism that warning shots are a bad idea because they can be taken as evidence that the shooter didn’t consider the threat in question to be deadly. Otherwise, they would have aimed for center mass instead of firing into the air (Biden style) or the ground. But in a recent case from Maryland, the prosecutor came to the opposite conclusion . . .

From cecildaily.com:

“He did everything he could have done. Maryland law says the person must first retreat if possible. He retreated as far as he could. He was …read more

Via:: Truth About Guns

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.