Posted September 10, 2019 11:00 am by Comments

By Tom Knighton

On Monday, I wrote about a poll from ABC and the Washington Post. I offered some thoughts on the poll, mostly taking the numbers at face value, which I really know better than to do. However, the numbers appeared to be a slight improvement over previous polls, which may have fed into my own confirmation bias. It told me something I sort of liked–it could have been more likable, but I saw it in a “glass half full” kind of way–and failed to delve much deeper.

Dana Loesch, however, had no issue looking under the surface.

The polling here is problematic. I’ll explain why in a thread — and on air. https://t.co/EHiZEFulOo

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 9, 2019

It’s like the people crafting the questions weren’t familiar enough with current law to accurately conduct polling. BGCs are standard (unless you’re in antiquities or legal and still-regulated transfer, neither of which are part of income) and online buys MUST go thru FFL. pic.twitter.com/CtPvWvsUwk

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 9, 2019

Apparently recidivism, pattern of reducing penalty for or dismissing altogether charges for felony gun crimes isn’t part of this, despite driving the homicide rate of …Read the Rest

Source:: Bearing Arms

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.