Posted March 10, 2016 1:24 am by Comments

By James England

Lina De Castillo wrote an inflammatory hit piece on the recent enactment of Texas CHL legislation that would make public campuses open to concealed carriers.

This piece was published in Quartz and it’s obvious from the sheer number of logical fallacies and the disownment by her own staunch anti-gun conspirators that sexual predators won’t be having an open hunting season on Texas campuses any time soon. At best, she tried to mount a tenuous link between guns and sexual violence. It hurts that a person who has the most to gain from these recent changes in law is obviously missing the biggest piece of this puzzle:

  1. Criminals aren’t deterred by gun laws AND
  2. Females on Texas campuses now have the legal ability to do something about it.

There’s always that serious “WTF” moment when the anti-gun movement just disintegrates into a bunch of dogs foaming at the mouth. Not only do they tout themselves as “academic” but there’s an unspoken moral superiority from which they espouse these lofty claims that are backed by zero evidence.

Let’s look no further to a quote given by the University of Texas at Austin president Gregory Fenves in his argument against concealed carry on Texas campuses:

“The presence …Read the Rest

Source:: Concealed Nation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.