BREAKING: 9th Circuit Rules Second Amendment Includes Right to Acquire Firearms
A Ninth Circuit three-judge panel has remanded the case of Teixeira vs. Alameda County back to the lower court for reconsideration. What does that mean? As the ruling reads, “the right to purchase and sell firearms is part and parcel of the historically recognized right to keep and bear arms.” Translation: backdoor gun sales prohibitions that feature set-off zones from residential areas are unconstitutional . . .
From prnewswire.com:
BELLEVUE, Wash., May 16, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — A three-judge panel for the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a 2-1 ruling that “the right to purchase and sell firearms is part and parcel of the historically recognized right to keep and bear arms” protected by the Second Amendment in a case brought by the Second Amendment Foundation.
SAF was joined in the case by the California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, the Calguns Foundation, Inc., and three businessmen, John Teixeira, Steve Nobriga and Gary Gamaza. SAF was represented by noted California civil rights attorney Don Kilmer, and the case was supported by an important amicus brief filed by Virginia attorney Alan Gura for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Gura won both the Heller …Read the Rest
Source:: Truth About Guns
Other News
- Trump Faces 34 Felonies at Trial. But Was There a Crime?
- Faces of Evil
- Meet The Former Biden DOJ Official Who Jumped Ship To Prosecute Trump
- Biden’s Former ‘Disinformation’ Czar Teams Up With Liberal Operatives For New Gig
- Joe Biden’s Orwellian “Good People on both Sides” Moment
- Tesla Reports One Of Its Worst Quarters In Years In Latest Sign Of Trouble For EV Market
- Biden Vowed To Protect American Steel — But Another Effort Of His Could Destroy It
- Simple, Low And Fair Taxes
- Blue State Poised To Use Taxpayer Dollars To Pay Journalists’ Salaries
- California’s EV Agenda Will Require Massive And Costly Upgrades, Analysis Finds
Leave a Reply