Posted December 15, 2015 8:17 pm by Comments

By Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell

By Thomas Sowell

Affirmative action is supposed to be a benefit to black and other minority students admitted with lower academic qualifications than some white students who are rejected. But Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia questioned whether being admitted to an institution geared to students with higher-powered academic records was a real benefit.
Thomas Sowell

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- The case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, involving racial double standards in admissions to the University of Texas at Austin, has an Alice-in-Wonderland quality that has been all too common in other Supreme Court cases involving affirmative action in academia, going all the way back to 1978.

Plain hard facts dissolve into rhetorical mysticism in these cases, where evasions of reality have been the norm.

One inconvenient reality is that racial double standards by government institutions are contrary to the “equal protection of the laws” prescribed by the 14th Amendment to the constitution. Therefore racial double standards must be called something else — whether “holistic” admissions criteria or a quest for the many magical benefits of “diversity” that are endlessly asserted but never demonstrated.

Such mental gymnastics are not peculiar to the Supreme Court of the United States. I encountered the same …Read the Rest

Source:: AmmoLand

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.